• Tuesday, 11 September 2018

    How To Justify The Criminalization Of Marijuana For Test Clear Drug Examinations


    For almost hundred years, rules of law forbid the possession of marijuana, and they used seven lines of reasoning to justify the criminalization. It all started back at the beginning of the 20th century, and since then the war on cannabis reached heights and started to cool down in the recent decade.
    Advocates for legalization are all across the USA, and public opinion is that federal law should completely decriminalize marijuana. Many states have done this but only based on state laws, while federal laws remained intact.
    Of course, the popularity of marijuana increased the usage, which is why most companies share the same drug policy with random tests and initial drug testing for employment. The best way to pass the test is by checking Clear Drug Tests online for more information.
    We will present you facts that officers of law and public used to justify the criminalization of marijuana:
    Experts Percieved It As Addictive Drug
    The Controlled Substances Act of 1970 classified marijuana as a drug that has a high potential for abuse. This particular classification came from the idea that when people decide to use pot, they tend to become potheads, which means that it will start to dominate their lives.
    This is the truth, and it happens but only in some cases, similarly as alcohol, which is legal, by the way. Therefore, the best way to fight this argument is to provide proof that marijuana is not addictive as the way government claims. It could be, but for people with addictive nature, they can get hooked to chocolate the same way.
    So, marijuana is addictive to some point, but when compared with other opiates and drugs, it is relatively low and simple to stop using it.
    To read the entire Controlled Substances Act of 1970, click here.
    It Is Not For Medicinal Use
    Even though people nowadays use marijuana for medicinal purposes, the government neglected this particular fact. Today, people are using weed for various diseases and ailments from cancer to glaucoma, but this is still not accepted on a national level.
    That is the main reason why medicinal marijuana legislation remains a federal controversy. But we can fight the argument that marijuana is not for therapeutic use, because numerous studies could show us how weed affects our lives and people with chronic conditions.
    They Linked It With Serious Narcotics Such As Heroin
    Early drug laws wanted to regulate narcotics by dividing them as opium and its derivatives such as morphine and heroin. On the other hand, cannabis is not a narcotic, but they still described it that way, along with other drugs such as cocaine. Best way to get relevant drug facts on cocaine is by checking this link: https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/cocaine.
    The American consciousness stuck in thinking that common recreational drugs such as nicotine, caffeine and alcohol and severe recreational drugs such as methamphetamine, cocaine, and heroin. Marijuana was in the middle of this particular specter, as a gateway drug that will help people get closer to recreational severe drugs.


    People Associated Weed With Oppressed Ethnic Groups
    The anti-marijuana movement started back in the ‘30s in Chicago and merged with the racism that surrounded people back then. Marijuana was associated with Mexican-Americans, which means that when they banned it, they wanted to discourage Mexican subcultures from improving and developing.
    However, during the ‘60s and ‘70s, middle-class white people started using it, and since then the popularity increased significantly. Finally, people stopped seeing cannabis as an ethnic drug, but the groundwork for the marijuana ban and movement that did that started as an ethical war against Mexicans.
    Federal Government And Laws Are Still The Same
    We can see that things remained the same on the national level, even though some states decided to allow people to use cannabis recreationally. The logic is that when something is banned for a short time, federal laws consider it unstable.
    On the other hand, if something has a ban for a long time, then the process of taking it off books is complicated and challenging and requires public consensus.
    People tend to enjoy the status quo that started a few years back when states allowed the use of weed. However, that is a problematic solution in the long run, but we can still say that the future will change laws against marijuana-ban all across the USA.

    No comments:

    Post a Comment